Is Searle right?
Almost universally disagreed with by AI writers
No 100% rock solid refutation like Turing’s of Lucas
Some points to ponder
- Is a thought experiment valid?
- E.g. 500 MHz x 1 hour >> Searle processor x 1 lifetime
- If machines lack intentionality, where do humans get it?
- Is AI a new kind of duality?
- Old: mind separate from body (villified by AI people)
- New: thought separate from brain
- Does it matter?